I disagree with this statement a 100%. It's a new century! Everything else is changing so why shouldn't the English language change? Texting lingo has been around for years so if it was going to destroy the English language wouldn't it have already? OMG first appears in a 1917 personal letter from Lord Fisher to Winston Churchhill (Allen, 2012). In 2010 LOL, OMG, and the first every symbol, ♥, was added to The Oxford English Dictionary (Lee, 2011). If dictionaries are accepting these abbreviations then why can't we?
![]() |
| This image shows that texting language is everywhere |
Real facts about texting:
- Texting helps students read
- Texting boosts phonology
- Students know when not to text
- Texting is a fun way to play with words
- Textisms have historical roots
- Texting does not distract students ("Can't texting help,")
Reference List:
Allen, E. (2012, August 7). O.m.g it's so old! phrase loved by today's teenagers was first used 100 years ago in letter to Winston Churchill. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2184777/O-M-G-old-Phrase-loved-todays-teenagers-used-100-years-ago-letter-Winston-Churchill-thought-LOL.html
Lee, A. (2011, March 24). Lol, omg, ♥ added to the Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/24/lol-omg-oxford-english-dictionary_n_840229.html
Baron, N. S. (2009). Are digital media changing language?.Educational Leadership, 66(6), 42-46. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar09/vol66/num06/Are-Digital-Media-Changing-Language¢.asp
x
Can texting help with spelling?. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.scholastic.com/teachers/article/can-texting-help-spelling

No comments:
Post a Comment